Categories

Bear in mind that this year, the entry is the first part of the judging process, where you need to convince judges, who will not know the detail as intimately as you do. The second part of the process will be a face to face ‘pitch’ with our judges, meaning that you can talk about the strengths of your entry directly to them.

For your entry, it is important to set out a structured pitch, with evidence to back up any claims. The two main criticisms in judges’ feedback from past awards is ‘Did not provide enough a strong enough argument as to why they should win’ and ‘No data or evidence to back up claims.’ Now, with the face-to-face round, you have an opportunity to convince them directly why you should win!

Innovation Awards 

Our Energy Champion award is designed to reward the teams that have made a demonstrable impact on the energy industry, whether through innovation, influence, or just plain enthusiasm and dedication. Nominations are sought from colleagues, suppliers or customers and testimonials are obviously beneficial. NB: Energy champions don’t have to be high-profile, or on a national stage: judges are looking for evidence of impact and a good ‘story’ from the candidate.
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

This category is designed to celebrate the developments in the buildings technologies and other innovations that do not fit easily into the other categories. This is the place to enter lighting systems, innovative components and other initiatives. Credit will be given for solid data – independent where possible - to back up efficiency claims.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Our popular digital category has been split to recognise the enormous contribution of digital systems, data collection, software and monitoring to the industry. Entrants will need to describe the innovative aspects; explain how it is used; and show evidence of the difference its use has made.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

The journey to net zero will need to focus attention on existing fuels as well as on new ones. This category seeks to recognise the advances being made in the important oil and gas sector. Credit will be given for solid data – independent where possible - to back up efficiency claims.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Our popular digital category has been split to recognise the enormous contribution of digital systems, data collection, software and monitoring to the industry. Entrants will need to describe the innovative aspects; explain how it is used; and show evidence of the difference its use has made.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Electric-driven systems are going to play a key part in the decarbonisation of UK energy, so this category seeks to recognise the efforts. Energy reduction can mean either more efficient performance or controlling it more effectively. Credit will be given for solid data – independent where possible - to back up efficiency claims.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Heating and cooling are a significant user of energy in any building, so this category recognises the cream of energy efficient building services or building systems. Energy reduction can mean either more efficient performance or controlling it more effectively. Credit will be given for solid data – independent where possible - to back up efficiency claims.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Our popular digital category has been split to recognise the enormous contribution of digital systems, data collection, software and monitoring to the industry. Entrants will need to describe the innovative aspects; explain how it is used; and show evidence of the difference its use has made.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

This new category seeks to recognise the initiatives that have been developed in the past year to help the country on its journey towards net zero emissions.The category is intended to be broad – convince the judges that your initiative is having or will have a definite impact on reducing carbon. Judges will be looking for impact, imagination and evidence of success or potential success.
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Project Awards 

This category looks for the year’s best energy-saving projects in the area of residential property – either private residence or social housing. It covers both new build and refurbishment/retrofit. In a sector which is politically charged, the judges are looking for demonstrable energy and carbon savings, backed up by data, with particular consideration for innovation, practicality repeatability, and other wider environmental impacts.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

This category looks for the year’s best energy-saving projects for the public sector – from healthcare to leisure - and covers both new build and refurbishment/retrofit. In a sector that naturally has to be judged in the context of budget restrictions, the judges are looking for demonstrable energy and carbon savings, backed up by data, with particular consideration for innovation, repeatability, public impact and other wider environmental impacts.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

This category looks for the year’s best energy-saving projects in the competitive arena of commercial buildings, and in the no-less important area of retail and industrial projects. It covers both new build and refurbishment/retrofit. In a sector where the requirements of all kinds of occupants need to be considered alongside energy efficiency, the judges are looking for demonstrable energy and carbon savings, backed up by data, with particular consideration for innovation, repeatability, and other wider environmental impacts.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Team Awards 

With energy supply attracting so much publicity in the popular press and the market so competitive, the Energy Awards judges are keen to sort out the myths from the reality, to delve beneath the hype and the headlines and to recognise the supplier that provides the best all-round service to business customers.

Suppliers should therefore provide evidence of service, effectiveness, investment and innovation for their customers large and small, backed with data, testimonial and case study where appropriate.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Getting the best for your customers is the name of the game for this award. Whether it is getting the best price, advising how to buy energy effectively or managing a client's carbon plan, this category aims to show why a business should use an intermediary and what advantages this offers. Open to companies with under 50 employees.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

Getting the best for your customers is the name of the game for this award. Whether it is getting the best price, advising how to buy energy effectively or managing a client's carbon plan, this category aims to show why a business should use an intermediary and what advantages this offers. Open to companies with over 50 employees.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

This category looks to reward collaborative efforts in energy reduction and is aimed at partnerships between end-users and their consultants, ESCO or CEM companies etc

A team may be formed by manufacturers, contractors/consultants and the end-user with a view to reducing a building or a portfolio of buildings energy usage. The judges are looking for energy savings that could not have been achieved without the effective use of the partnerships and the diversity of skill and/or technologies deployed.

Qualifying period Jan 2021 to April 2022

You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?

This new category seeks to recognise those campaigns that have been most successful in influencing their intended recipients. The category is open to marketing campaigns, social media campaigns and information campaigns alike. Judges will be looking for impact, imagination and of course success in achieving results.
You have used the multi-select option by clicking a checkbox.
Process or clear your selections to enable the item buttons.

Summary of entry (max 150 words)

Please provide a clear and concise summary of your entry. These are the words that need to persuade the judges that you are the winner.

Concept/strategy (max 250 words)

  • Please clearly explain what the project was.
  • What was the overall aim of the project?
  • Why was the particular approach chosen?
  • Were specific targets set for the project?

Planning and delivery (max 250 words)

  • How was it planned?
  • How was it implemented and integrated into operations?
  • How were systems and steps put in place to ensure the best results?
  • Who else was involved in the project?

Success and results (max 250 words)

  • Was it delivered on time, to plan, and if applicable on budget?
  • Please include quantifiable data on energy savings
  • What other measures of success were achieved? (eg customer satisfaction)
  • Are the techniques repeatable?
  • Please include testimonials where appropriate

Innovation (max 250 words)

  • Is there anything that makes this project innovative? How is it different to other comparable projects?
  • Does it apply any new way of thinking, new approach, new systems or new technology?